June 2026

Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir Lectures at International Conference on Hope and Trust in Times of Crisis

On 22 June 2026, Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir gave a lecture at the International Conference on the Theme of Hope & Trust in Times of Crisis, held at the American University of Armenia (AUA) in Yerevan.

The conference was organized by the AUA Center for Ethics in Public Affairs (ETICA) in association with the International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP), the Armenian Philosophical Academy, and Yerevan State University (YSU). It brought together leading philosophers and scholars from around the world to discuss the role of hope and trust in responding to contemporary social and political crises.

Sigríður’s lecture was entitled „From Trust as Foundation to Trust as Process: Trust in Malecentric Philosophy, Feminist Care Ethics, and Philosophies of Recognition.“ In her presentation, she examined competing philosophical conceptions of trust and argued for understanding trust not as a fixed foundation but as an ongoing process that is cultivated through recognition, dialogue, and embodied interaction.

The conference was attended by Armenia’s First Lady, Anna Hakobyan, who later shared this video from the event on social media. https://fb.watch/I4Sd4LrwSt/

In connection with the conference, Sigríður also participated in the annual meeting of International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP), the global organization representing philosophical societies. She has served on the FISP Steering Committee for more than a decade and chaired its Committee on Gender Issues from its establishment in 2015 until 2025.

Gendlin’s philosophy of felt understanding

In this podcast, Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir and Donata Schoeller introduce the uniqueness of Gendlin’s philosophy and discuss how the felt-sense approach fosters critical creativity in their thinking while continually challenging habituated dualistic frameworks of body and mind.

What is Thinking at the Edge (TAE)?

In this podcast, Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir and Donata Schoeller discuss Thinking at the Edge as a novel philosophical practice and explore how it can be understood as methodologically complementing traditional approaches of critical thinking, by challenging a disembodied understanding of the mind.

Freedom to Make Sense at Beyond the Mind: Organising for Eco-Embodied Scholarship

From 8–11 June 2026, Lovísa Eiríksdóttir, postdoctoral researcher in the Freedom to Make Sense project, participated in the conference Beyond the Mind: Organising for Eco-Embodied Scholarship at Hazel Hill Wood near Salisbury, England. The gathering brought together scholars and practitioners from fields including sustainability, economics, business studies, and the arts to explore more embodied and ecologically attuned approaches to scholarship.

Lovísa facilitated a two-hour workshop introducing Thinking at the Edge to business scholars and educators, inviting participants to explore how embodied knowing can contribute to research, teaching, and organizational practice.

Set in the unique woodland environment of Hazel Hill Wood, the conference combined academic dialogue with shared practical activities, creative practices, walks, music, meditation, and communal care for the site. The event was organised by Steffen Böhm, Friederike Döbbe, and George Ferns, with support from ephemera: theory & politics in organization, which is preparing a special issue based on the gathering.

The Freedom to Make Sense research group works actively to reimagine how we create academic life and how we show up at academic gatherings. We are grateful for opportunities to connect with other like-minded scholars and research groups who are exploring similar ways of fostering more embodied, collaborative, and meaningful academic practices.

New documentary about Eugene Gendlin

A new documentary about the philosophy of Eugene Gendlin is out. Created to mark the 100th anniversary of his birth and premiered at a conference that took place in Vienna in June 2026 in honor of his work. Gendlin is likely the philosopher who has influenced the Freedom to Make Sense project the most. He showed that philosophical thinking is accessible to all of us. It begins with a felt sense of an issue and develops through an attempt to grasp something as a meaningful whole. It is a way of thinking that helps us become more fully ourselves while deepening our understanding of others.

April 2026

Practicing Embodied Critical and Creative Thinking  — Together, in Bernried
April 26th

The MakeSense international research project recently spent an intensive week in Bernried, Bavaria, exploring and advancing methods of embodied philosophical, creative, and critical thinking.

We were 25 researchers from over 20 universities, coming together from Australia, the USA, Canada, Europe, Japan, and the Middle East — united by a shared commitment to doing philosophical thinking in practice. We are philosophers, artistic researchers, psychologists, cognitive scientists, and more.

What makes our work distinctive is the leap into practice.
We do not only investigate the theoretical and scientific foundations of embodied thinking — thinking grounded in lived experience and the felt sense.
We also train and develop methods such as:

– Focusing
– Thinking at the Edge (TAE)
– Micro-phenomenological interviewing
– Mindfulness-inspired research practices
– Artistic research approaches

This integration of practice and research places our project at the forefront of international developments in embodied thinking.

📘 Our open-access book:
Practicing Embodied Thinking in Research and Learning
by Donata Schoeller, Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir, and Geoffrey Walkerden.

The Bernried workshop generated new insights, discoveries, and directions for our ongoing research and future collaborations.

We were also joined by a filmmaker, who documented our work and conducted interviews for an upcoming film on embodied research practices.

At a time of AI expansion and increasingly disembodied modes of thinking, our work asks:
How can we bring lived, embodied meaning-making back into higher education?

This is what we are building — together.

#EmbodiedThinking #MakeSense #PhilosophyInPractice #HigherEducation #AIandHumanThinking #Focusing #TAE #ResearchInnovation

February 2026

Conversation about Embodied Critical Thinking
February 9th

Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir and Donata Schoeller were guests on the Future Learning Design Podcast. The episode challenges the long‑standing assumption that critical thinking is simply a neutral, logical skill set. Instead, it draws on emerging cognitive science to show that reasoning is inseparable from emotion, embodiment, and lived context. The implications for education are significant, pointing toward more sophisticated approaches to teaching critical thinking across disciplines – from mathematics to philosophy.

You can listen to the conversation here.

If you’re interested in finding out more about the upcoming training with Donata and Sigríður, check out the link here.

January 2026

Aesthetics and Sustainability Meet in Granada
January 29-30th

The University of Granada hosted an international workshop titled “Aesthetics, Sustainability and Education” at the historic Carmen de la Victoria on 29–30 January, bringing together researchers, artists, and educators to examine how aesthetic experience can deepen public engagement with ecological issues.

Organizers emphasized that transformative learning requires more than information — it demands affective and aesthetic shifts in how people perceive the world and their place within it. The workshop therefore explored how environmental aesthetics and the aesthetics of science might foster more attentive, caring, and sustainable forms of relating to nature.

The program combined lectures by senior scholars with short project presentations and group sessions led by early‑stage investigators, creating a collaborative environment for interdisciplinary exchange.

Ólafur Páll Jónsson, as well as being one of the workshop’s organizers, delivered a lecture titled “Hope and Material Reality.” This talk examined how hope can be grounded in material reality by contrasting abstract notions of the horizon with concrete, experiential accounts from Thoreau and visual art.

Also presenting were Gunndís Ýr Finnbogadóttir who presented “Unstable Ground” and  Monika Lindner, who contributed a poster titled “An Experiential Perspective: Relating to Oneself Is Caring for the World.”

For more information see the website of the event here.

You can also find impressions on LinkedIn here.

Gendlin Research Center Opens 2026 Philosophy Prize
January 5th

The Gendlin Research Center has opened submissions for the 2026 Gendlin Philosophy Prize, a $1,000 award recognizing outstanding scholarship on the work and thought of Eugene Gendlin. The competition is open to scholars, current graduate students in philosophy or related fields, as well as individuals who completed a Master’s degree or Ph.D. within the past four years. Submissions must engage substantively with Gendlin’s philosophy.

Papers may not exceed 2,500 words. The winning author will be invited to present their work in a public online event moderated by members of the Gendlin Research Center. Entries are due April 1, 2026 and prize decisions will be announced by June 1, 2026.

For additional details click here

December 2025

Conversation with Greg Madison
Dec 11th

On the 11th of December Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir had a conversation with Greg Madison on his podcast The Living Process. The conversation delved into the unique experience of teaching embodied reflection to philosophy students. Sigríður shared insights on how this approach can deepen understanding and foster a more holistic form of learning, bridging the gap between abstract reasoning and lived experience. Sigríður emphasised the necessity of cultivating an environment where students are not only encouraged to question and analyse but also supported in developing the confidence to express their perspectives.

The conversation extended to contemporary issues surrounding Artificial Intelligence. Sigríður and Greg compared the processes of machine learning and human thinking. While AI can process vast amounts of information and identify patterns at impressive speeds, they discussed how human cognition remains distinctive in its capacity for embodied understanding, emotional nuance, and ethical deliberation.

This episode offered a rich exploration of what it means to think critically and reflectively in today’s world – both as individuals and within academic communities. Sigríður’s insights on embodied reflection, the challenges of imposter syndrome, and the evolving role of Artificial Intelligence provided valuable food for thought, underscoring the ongoing relevance of philosophy in navigating contemporary challenges.

You can listen to the whole conversation here

Greg Madison
November 2025

Lecture at the University of Bahia in Brazil
Nov 26th

On November 26, Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir delivered a lecture titled Philosophy as Eros: Thinking with a Felt Sense at the University of Bahia in Brazil. In her talk, she explored how Socratic methods of inquiry can be reinterpreted in light of contemporary research on the embodied and experiential foundations of thought.

Her central argument was that the growing presence of AI in higher education creates both an opening and an urgent need to cultivate embodied philosophical practice—critical thinking rooted in lived, felt experience—across all levels of academia.

The lecture unfolded in three parts:

  1. The ancient roots of Eros in Plato’s Symposium.
  2. The link between love and philosophy as a source of inspiration in contemporary feminist philosophy.
  3. Philosophizing from a felt sense as a way of practicing philosophy as Eros—understood both as desire for knowledge and as the courage to think independently.

 

Throughout her discussion, Sigríður emphasized Eros as a particular conception of love: a driving force in philosophical reflection. She highlighted that philosophizing from a felt sense represents a contemporary mode of practicing philosophy as Eros. This approach, exemplified in Eugene Gendlin’s work, cannot be fully grasped through theory alone—it requires direct experience and a genuine leap into practice.

For those interested in exploring this leap further, an open-access book has emerged from a research project on embodied methodologies of philosophical thinking: Practicing Embodied Thinking in Research and Learning, edited by Donata Schoeller, Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir, and Greg Walkerden (Routledge, open access). Read the book here.

Conference about Artificial Intelligence in Education at the Teacher's Academy
Nov 21st

On November 21st there was a Conference on artificial intelligence in education and pedagogy at the Teacher’s Academy. Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir, Guðbjörg R. Jóhannesdóttir and Björn Þorsteinsson did a presentation on the benefits of bringing the methods from the Freedom to Make Sense project into the classroom. Their presentation had the name Freedom to Make Sense: Embodied, Experiential and Mindful Learning in Higher Education. They addressed the issues regarding artificial intelligence in higher education from the perspective of embodied organic intelligence.

A Workshop for Teachers
Nov 15th

On 15 November, a MakeSense workshop for upper secondary (gymnasium) teachers titled “I Am My Own Laboratory: Cultivating Felt Sense and Attentiveness in Education and Teaching” was held. Twenty teachers from Fjölbrautaskólinn í Breiðholti (FB) and The Reykjavík School of Visual Arts attended. The workshop was facilitated by Guðbjörg R. Jóhannesdóttir, Monika Lindner, and Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir, who introduced methods of embodied critical and creative thinking. These approaches can be traced back to the University of Chicago and the work of Eugene Gendlin, Mary Hendricks, and others.

The workshop aimed to:

  • demonstrate simple steps for working with felt sense in education

  • practice attentive listening

  • explore ways to find one’s own voice and greater clarity

These methods support teachers in cultivating attentiveness, independent critical thinking, and constructive communication in the classroom. In the age of artificial intelligence, it is especially important for students to stay in touch with the embodied grounds of their own thinking.

October 2025

Lecture at Fjölbrautarskólinn in Breiðholt

Oct 9th

Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir delivered a lecture at Fjölbrautaskólinn í Breiðholti (FB) on 9 October titled “The Battle for Attention,” examining how attention functions in schools and education in an era shaped by social media, the internet, and AI. Drawing on Simone Weil’s claim that training attention is the central aim of education, Sigríður outlined a philosophy of attention and introduced Eugene Gendlin’s Focusing-based methodology of embodied thinking as a practical approach to cultivating attention at all educational levels. Monika Lindner and Guðbjörg R. Jóhannesdóttir guided participants through exercises to experience these methods firsthand.

 

This talk opened a lecture series hosted by Fjölbrautaskólinn í Breiðholti in celebration of the school’s 50th anniversary. FB is one of the largest gymnasiums in Iceland, with nearly 2,000 pupils, and the audience comprised school leaders and teachers.

May 2025

The Olive Tree Programme

May 30 - June 3

The Olive Tree Programme was held at the University of Iceland from May 30 to June 3. The Olive Tree Programme aims to train individuals in methods that enable them to develop resilience and emotional endurance. The instructors were Margaret Quinn, Tom Larkin, and Mary Jennings from the Irish Focusing Network. They have decades of experience in training and applying embodied-cognitive techniques such as focusing, which are rooted in a felt sense for issues and problems.The methodology of focusing was developed by Eugene Gendlin at the intersection of psychology and philosophy.

The project manager and fourth instructor of the programme is Ghada Radwan, a master’s student at the School of Education at the University of Iceland. The Olive Tree Programme is part of her master’s thesis. The project is also part of the interdisciplinary research initiative Freedom to Make Sense (www.makesense.hi.is), a collaboration between researchers at the University of Iceland and the Iceland University of the Arts, as well as an interdisciplinary group of researchers from over 20 universities and research institutions around the world.

Participants in the course work with Arabic-speaking immigrants through various institutions in Iceland, including the Icelandic Red Cross, the City of Reykjavík, the Municipality of Kópavogur, and the Muslim Cultural Center in Iceland. At the end of the course, participants received certification to teach the methods in their own professional settings. The project was funded by the Development Fund for Immigration Affairs and the Swiss organization Challenge to Change, with support from the Icelandic Red Cross and the research project Freedom to Make Sense.

In the philosophical podcast Siggasophy (Sigguspeki), the team discusses how the program draws on the Focusing-based psychology and philosophy of Eugene Gendlin, offering a grounded, embodied approach to healing, resilience and life skills.

Visit from Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences

 

May 5-10, 2025

 

 

This week, a group from Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences is visiting Iceland. The delegation is led by Professor Werner Stork, an expert in management and organization who collaborates with MakeSense, and Jannika Haag, a project manager in the Department of Public Management and a TECTU alumna.
 
The visiting group includes professors, researchers, students, city council members, and human resources professionals from firms in and around Darmstadt. They are part of the emerging field of New Business and Management Studies, which critically reflects on traditional management models. As the group explains: “The prevailing management models are no longer sufficient. We no longer believe in them, but we do not yet have new models.”
Members of the group are also part of the Network of Mindful Universities in Germany, and they are now beginning a collaboration with MakeSense to explore embodied, critical, and creative approaches to scholarly thinking.
 
During their visit, the group held a session on Thinking at the Edge with Professor Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir at the University of Iceland. Together, they explored the concept of “transition” and its significance for their research, professional work, and studies.
The group also visited Reykjavík City Parliament, where Hjálmar Sveinsson, Alexandra Briem, and Eva Pandora Baldursdóttir introduced them to the Digital Reykjavík project.
April 2025

Thinking At The Edge (TAE) Symposium

Exploring Experiences and Applications of TAE

April 4-6, 2025, online 

The International Focusing Institute (TIFI)

 

The International Focusing Institute (TIFI) is dedicating a symposium to “Thinking at the Edge” (TAE). Members of the Freedom to Make Sense research group will participate with their own presentations and in panel discussions.

Thinking at the Edge (TAE) is a systematic way to think about our world and ourselves by directly referring to a felt sense. The TAE process starts from a knowing for which we don’t have words yet.  The words and concepts that we know from public life tend to paint with a broad brush; public language seldom captures precisely what we are experiencing. The steps of TAE help us to develop a fresh use of language, to find just the right words which truly fit what we want to say.  We learn through TAE to let words emerge gradually from the felt sense. Then, from our unique expression, TAE helps us to find ways to express our knowing in generalized terms as well, so that our insights can be communicated to others.  In this way, our work in TAE can open new possibilities not only for ourselves but for others as well.

This symposium is meant as a chance for those who have at least a basic knowledge of TAE to share your knowledge, your insights, your enthusiasm, your questions and your edges with other attendees. We will have chances for informal TAE-based conversations or partnerships. 

More information and registration (still possible; recordings are available): TAE Symposium

Donata Schoeller and Sigga Thorgeirsdottir – Bringing TAE to Higher Education

Over the past nine years, Sigga and Donata have worked to bring Gendlin’s methodology of focusing-based thinking into teaching and research at the university level.

To this end, they have gathered leading scholars and practitioners of Gendlin’s philosophy, psychology, and methodology from around the world, aiming to make his work better known within academia.

In this session, Donata and Sigga will discuss both the obstacles and successes of integrating Gendlin’s philosophy and methodologies into higher education and philosophy.

They also hope to have time to engage in the philosophical practice of TAE. By practicing together, we will experience the richness of a TAE movement, which enacts the interplay between experiencing and conceptualization as a responsive dance.

We will explore a TAE move on two levels: first, by honing the insights that emerge during the practice, and second, by reflecting on the move itself as we practice it. Both levels help us better understand what TAE reveals about the human capacity for thought, as well as the delicate, embodied magic of this capacity—something that, in an age of AI, is in need of cultivation.

Satoko Tokumaru – Enjoy Crossing
Satoko learned about TAE in 2004 and has been teaching it for over 20 years. Her experience teaching TAE to a large number of students at a university has transformed her TAE into something that is easy to understand. She has developed a number of exercises that allow you to learn the important points of TAE in a short amount of time. In this workshop, you will experience one of them: „Enjoy Crossing.“ Participants should prepare two photos that you like in advance.

 

Monika Lindner & Frans Sandbergen – Exploring Multiple Edges in Your Thinking at the Edge Journey

If you take the steps of Thinking at the Edge to a meaningful edge of what cannot yet be said, then you embark on a journey of discovery that is as effective as it is vulnerable.  Something new comes through the creative act of receiving. 

In the process, you may encounter a variety of surprising and challenging thresholds, „broken“ edges, ridges and the like, which you had perhaps not expected nor anticipated, and which indeed seem as though they might lead you off the path. In such situations, it is helpful to take a step back, as it were, and adopt a meta level view.  This view from the meta level can clarify the situation, and the way you are — and want to be — with your TAE topic.

This workshop offers such a meta-space for searching for traces of experiences, aspects, practices and qualities of what one can call a „reflective (self) care.“ Developing a culture of reflective (self) care supports the evolution of a process at the edge of what can be said, and then itself becomes nurtured by that very process.

March 2025

Freedom to make sense: Becoming more real in thinking

Lecture by Prof. Donata Schoeller at the Institute of Philosophy, Thursday March 27, in Árnagarður 311 at 15-16.30 GMT 

 

In her lecture, Donata Schoeller will sketch how an embodied and enacted concept of the mind opens up a novel practice space of thinking. This space is challenging and at the same time rewarding, by providing possibilities to overcome alienating restrictions implicit in scientific languages, as well as in listening and debating habits. As a work in progress, her thoughts on these connections circle around the meaning of a „freedom to make sense“ in the context of higher education: how does an embodied approach to the mind and to meaning support students and researchers to find their own true questions, their own voice, and help them  make sense of their real experiences and situations in an age of virtualization and AI. 
Professor Donata Schoeller is the conceptual director of the international research project Freedom to Make Sense (makesense.hi.is). She is a newly appointed research professor in philosophy at the University of Iceland and serves as the academic director of the Erasmus + Training in Embodied Critical Thinking and Understanding project (trainingect.com). Alongside her theoretical research on embodied cognition, classical pragmatism, phenomenology and classical German philosophy, she has undergone extensive training in first person practices such as Focusing, Thinking-at-the-Edge, Micro-phenomenology, and meditation. Based on her research and years of practical training, she developed Embodied Critical Thinking and Understanding in collaboration with Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir.  She has fostered a vibrant and motivated community dedicated to interdisciplinary research of embodied, experiential and mindful thinking practices and has published extensively (donataschoeller.com). 

Freedom to Make Sense: Thinking from the Felt Sense

Presentation at the University of Iceland, March 7th

 

Participants in the excellence project „Freedom to Make Sense: Embodied, Experiential Research“ presented the theoretical foundations and methods of embodied critical thinking in learning and research. These methods aim to activate students’ and researchers’ own thinking by systematically utilizing their experiential knowledge. In other words, critical thinking is enhanced by engaging with subjects through one’s own felt sense of issues and fostering cognitive empathy in thought processes.

The seminar demonstrated how these methods are applied in teaching across various disciplines and with diverse groups. Finally, attendees had the opportunity to engage in felt-sensing exercises.

Photos are done by Chae Won Oh

Guðbjörg R. Jóhannesdóttir, Gunndís Finnbogadóttir og Kristín Valsdóttir│Embodied Critical Thinking and Artistic Research
We discussed sensuous, tacit, and embodied knowledge in arts education. We also explored the embodied, cognitive, and aesthetic dimensions of scholarly and artistic thinking. Finally, we highlighted intersections between artistic and scientific thinking.
Donata Schoeller, Elsa Haraldsdóttir, Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir and Ghada Radwan│Creating a Space for Embodied Philosophical Thinking in the University Classroom

We shared insights into how to create conditions for listening—both inner listening and felt sensing—along with trust and cognitive empathy in the classroom. This is based on our experiences in introductory courses as well as in research seminars. We discussed this in relation to the methodologies of Focusing and Thinking at the Edge.

November 2024

Exploring ECT and Freedom to Make Sense

Prof. Schoeller’s workshops at University of Virginia

 

In November 2024, Donata Schoeller introduced the Embodied Critical Thinking and Freedom to Make Sense approaches in several workshops attended by an interdisciplinary group of graduate students and faculty members from the University of Virginia, as well as one introductory lecture at the the University of Toronto. She was invited by Professor Dorothe Bach, the Associate Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at the University of Virginia, by Professor Michael Sheehey,Director of Research at the Contemplative Sciences Center at the University of Virginia, and Jeanne Watson, the former Associate Dean of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto. 

„Embodied Critical Thinking and Understanding“ (ECTU)is an approach, research, and training initiative developed by a team of researchers at the University of Iceland. Over the years, it has evolved into a European Erasmus program and won an excellence grant for an international research project calles Freedom to Make Sense: Embodied, Experiential and Mindful research. The presentation will focus on some fundamental philosophical considerations underlying this approach. 

ECTU acknowledges the complexity of lived and situated experience as the basis of human thinking, which always again needs processes of clarification and in-depth- understanding. This experiential characteristic of thinking calls for methods and practices that carefully open up a binding complexity, the intricacy of a point, of a crux, of a problem. Such understanding is not downloadable. Clarification and in-depth understanding often enough are the results of an unpredictable process. Acknowledging that human thinking always requires processes of clarification and realization harmonizes well with Kant’s three core questions of the Enlightenment: What can I know? What should I do?  What may I hope? In a time of polarization, turmoil, and inflammable discourses, practices of embodied thinking and understanding strive to offer teachable and practicable methods to enhance listening skills and the capacity to handle complexity and vulnerability.

What participants say

Faculty members 

„I deeply appreciated this workshop. It gave us permission to see “simple” things more completely and in ways that can guide understanding and shared reality. It gave us a process to think openly and listen carefully (with attention and care). It gave us time and space to be curious and creative. Thank you!“

„Today’s experience provided a long sought-for reminder for the things that matter in  one’s interaction with the world, with one’s immediate surroundings and with oneself. It restored modes of listening that nowadays are almost extinct, and gave slowness and reflection a legitimate space within our daily experiences.“

“The process and experience today was very meaningful. It challenged me (in the most positive way) to apply it with my MBA students and be attentive to the individual pacing that the process requires. Thank you.”

„As someone that works with students this workshop was a great experience in listening without talking, and finding the root of felt self. Dropping the concept of my word and communicating what I was feeling with others with clarity was awesome. I felt more connected with the people I was talking to while also learning about myself.“

“What I found most productive (in an extremely thought-provoking workshop) was writing/thinking and the “background at my understanding of the concepts” I kind of can’t believe I haven’t yet done that with the key word of my book before! My concept was invention, and when I thought about it a flood of memories/ images made me realize how my personal relationship with this concept has really informed what I’m thinking about/ reacting to in my current research.
I would love to try this in my teaching because people are so rarely asked about their personal histories/experiences with concepts.They just go tot the academic information rather than the “felt-knowing”. The arguments, logic discourses. But felt-knowing can yield thinking that is so much richer and can deepen our understanding.Thank you! This was fantastic and so valuable to me.“

“Blocks and dead ideas arise in a culture of knowledge and thought that demands that every idea becomes a product. This is a tonic, a counterbalance, another way into and back to the reel of creativity.” 

“This workshop and my conversation with my partner helped me see connections between concepts that didn’t seem related at first and made me realize (or remember) how playfully deep thought can be… what time given to process can make possible.”

“Hearing my thoughts reflected back to me was very moving. It was hard to listen without interfering. The cornerstone of this process appears to be the power of reflection, which I think translates to engineering well.
As an educator, I can use my alternate words to design lessons around the facets of this concept ( what I want to convey).”

„I appreciated being able to slow down and be in closer conversation with others. I also appreciated being able to share “unformed” thoughts in an academic environment. I would have loved to take a moment and feel into my body more. I was also inspired how I coils use this in my classroom- its; a little scary but useful! Thank you!“

„This was great! I leave a lot of workshops frustrated or disappointed  because they don’t “give” me what I’m looking for. And while this workshop was not at all what I expected for something on critical thinking, it reminded me to slow down. It reminded me to be transparent with students. It reminded me to listen and give them space to listen to each other. And it taught me that not everything we do has to enact change. Conversations can inspire change, but change can be gradual, immediate or absent. And ultimately I think everything comes back to driving! Thanks for your time!“

Graduate students

“Embodiment in graduate research is critical. Empathy cannot coexist with guilt in design practice – architects and planners must cultivate a strong sense of self identity before going out to make change in the world.
Workshops like [this] are urgently relevant and invaluable spaces to slow down, intempt habits, and expand thinking. Please invite me to future workshops so I can continue to cultivate these skills! Thank you”

“It was a really rewarding experience. The aspects of self reflection and questioning the ideas and motivations behind concepts/research was really interesting. The openness of the space fostered thoughtful conversation and reflection.“

“Making your layers clear” really resonated as well. I saw how I could improve in how I articulate. The session made me aware of how to be a better listener and mindfully interact with logic and understanding. I would be interested in more sessions!“

“Yes! I was mentioning that the U.S. is a hassle and holding such events/space to just sit, think, understand, eat, is reviewed (culturally) unproductive. We’re all on a run, stressed, anxious, all the time because of it.
Thank you for the space, the food, the prompts, and maybe next time it can be together with a writing session (there goes my capitalistic impulse again) :,) “

“One main take-away from this event for me, as a physicist, is that even though we oftentimes feel overwhelmed with tasks to do or ideas to come up with in our pads, it’s important to think about the process itself of coming up with ideas and communicating them. Especially in physics, where these activities are strongly discouraged.“

„I believe this thought process stretches far beyond college campuses and higher education institutions I think the lack of listening and the concept that not every voice or thought should be considered valuable goes all the way up to our government and has seeped its way into our everyday society and is deeply embedded in our social norms and values ( even though we like to believe we are immune to implicit biases and are more “progressive” than ever before)“

“This workshop was really helpful in a conceptual way, but also in an affective, personal way. I not only see my concept differently, but I see my role in understanding this concept differently.”

June 2018

Embodied Critical Thinking (ECT)

Research Group since 2018 

The Institute of Philosophy at the University of Iceland

The ECT research group was established in 2018 by Prof. Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir, Prof. Björn Þorsteinsson, Dr. Donata Schoeller and Dr. Guðbjörg R. Jóhannesdóttir. Ole Martin Sandberg, Steinunn Hreinsdóttir, Gústav Adolf Bergmann Sigurbjörnsson and Monika Lindner were also involved. It runs a monthly research lab and has offered numerous lectures, workshops and training sessions. Since then, further projects have developed from it, such as „Teaching Embodied Critical Thinking and Understanding“ (TECTU) and Freedom to Make Sense.

Its purpose is to rethink critical thinking in embodied form.

Critical thinking is the core ability to be trained in philosophy. Enlightenment, according to Immanuel Kant, implies the courage to think-for-oneself. How does philosophy teach that? Philosophy conveys rich contents, but does it convey rich methods to encourage students to face their very own questions/ideas evolving from their actual experience of a highly complex world ? 

ECT researches how the embodied and entangled being-in-the-world is the ground from where we think critically. 

ECT researchers explore (interact with) an embodied space of meaning, in which the fresh precision of experiential processes is as important and relevant for the philosophical discourse as arguments are. 

ECT explores what this means in terms of what we think and how we think, in terms of academic practices as well as in terms of educational practices. 

The aim of ECT is to undertake a systematic, thoroughgoing and practical reconsideration of the concept and practice of critical thinking by engaging recent theories and discussions of embodiment in terms of integrating the complexity of feeling and experiential backgrounds in thinking. 

The theories and pedagogics of ECT were put to practice in teaching, tested and qualitatively assessed in seminars for students, and in workshops for teachers and researchers. International universities participate in the project, as well as two transdisciplinary research institutes in Århus and Chicago. Internationally leading researchers and transdisciplinary research centers in the field of embodiment are involved in contributing to the theoretical and practical components of the project. The project takes its inspiration from Eugene Gendlin’s “pioneering work” (Depraz, Varela and Vermersch 2002: 2) on how to deliberately engage embodied experiential and felt backgrounds in reflective, creative and research processes. 

Contemporary philosophers have described various functions of tacit and implicit forms of knowing that expand our understanding of rationality, yet until recently there has been a truly inconvenient shortage of means to methodologically draw upon these more-than-conceptual forms of thinking. Research in the cognitive sciences confirms how engaging an intricacy implicit in feeling and lived experience expands the scope of frameworks which one has at hand, fostering the ability to think within complexity (Damasio 1994, 1999, Depraz, Varela and Vermersch 2002, Ratcliffe 2008, Petitmengin 2007, 2016, Petitmengin and Bitbol 2009). 

Gendlin’s methodology of “Focusing” and the philosophical technique of “Thinking at the Edge” that he developed at the intersection of phenomenology, pragmatism and humanistic psychology, have been applied in teaching philosophy and in developing research projects in universities worldwide, but have not yet been systematically explored in relation to critical, problem-based transdisciplinary thinking abilities of students and researchers. The ECT research project is a first-time inquiry into the effects of these methodologies in view of an enhancement of critical thinking abilities on the basis of an evidence-based assessment. 

ECT manifests the “experiential turn” in philosophical education, responding to the insight that cultivating thinking is not only about cognitive development and good grades, and critical discourse is not exclusively restricted to debating positions. The conception of the intellect as an analytical modality of detachment is complemented by an understanding of intellect as a modality of openness to the world in experience, which holds “only insofar as we know how to make contact with it” (Noe, 2012: 3) and thus emphasizes perceptual faculties no less than cognitive abilities. To foster creative and communal, but also independent and problemoriented thinking requires connecting with an experiential basis. Encouraging students to draw on and develop their ability to experience and feel complex situations in addition to their cognitive capacities (Dewey 1984, Gilligan 1993, Gendlin 2017, Ratcliffe 2008) enhances transparency in argumentation and leads to independent, yet engaged and problem-based thinking. ECT is an integrative methodology that teaches how to combine different kinds of logical precision with felt situational experience. This helps students tackle the real-life challenges of issues that matter in today’s paradoxical and complex world. 

news-1701

yakinjp

yakinjp

rtp yakinjp

yakinjp

yakinjp

yakin jp

yakinjp id

maujp

maujp

maujp

\

sabung ayam online

sabung ayam online

SLOT MAHJONG

sabung ayam online

article 0000021

article 0000022

article 0000023

article 0000024

article 0000025

article 0000026

article 0000027

article 0000028

article 0000029

article 0000030

article 0000031

article 0000032

article 0000033

article 0000034

article 0000035

article 0000036

article 0000037

article 0000038

article 0000039

article 0000040

article 0000041

article 0000042

article 0000043

article 0000044

article 0000045

article 0000046

article 0000047

article 0000048

article 0000049

article 0000050

perkara 0000052

perkara 0000053

perkara 0000054

perkara 0000055

perkara 0000056

perkara 0000057

perkara 0000058

perkara 0000059

perkara 0000060

perkara 0000061

perkara 0000062

perkara 0000063

perkara 0000064

perkara 0000065

perkara 0000066

perkara 0000067

perkara 0000068

perkara 0000069

perkara 0000070

perkara 0000071

perkara 0000072

perkara 0000073

perkara 0000074

perkara 0000075

perkara 0000076

perkara 0000077

perkara 0000078

perkara 0000079

perkara 0000080

pengadilan 000051

pengadilan 000052

pengadilan 000053

pengadilan 000054

pengadilan 000055

pengadilan 000056

pengadilan 000057

pengadilan 000058

pengadilan 000059

pengadilan 000060

pengadilan 000061

pengadilan 000062

pengadilan 000063

pengadilan 000064

pengadilan 000065

pengadilan 000066

pengadilan 000067

pengadilan 000068

pengadilan 000069

pengadilan 000070

pengadilan 000071

pengadilan 000072

pengadilan 000073

pengadilan 000074

pengadilan 000075

pengadilan 000076

pengadilan 000077

pengadilan 000078

pengadilan 000079

pengadilan 000080

artikel 000000071

artikel 000000072

artikel 000000073

artikel 000000074

artikel 000000075

artikel 000000076

artikel 000000077

artikel 000000078

artikel 000000079

artikel 000000080

artikel 000000081

artikel 000000082

artikel 000000083

artikel 000000084

artikel 000000085

artikel 000000086

artikel 000000087

artikel 000000088

artikel 000000089

artikel 000000090

artikel 000000091

artikel 000000092

artikel 000000093

artikel 000000094

artikel 000000095

artikel 000000096

artikel 000000097

artikel 000000098

artikel 000000099

artikel 000000100

artikel 000000101

artikel 000000102

artikel 000000103

artikel 000000104

artikel 000000105

artikel 000000106

artikel 000000107

artikel 000000108

artikel 000000109

artikel 000000110

artikel 000000111

artikel 000000112

artikel 000000113

artikel 000000114

artikel 000000115

artikel 000000116

artikel 000000117

artikel 000000118

artikel 000000119

artikel 000000120

pemohonan 000001

pemohonan 000002

pemohonan 000003

pemohonan 000004

pemohonan 000005

pemohonan 000006

pemohonan 000007

pemohonan 000008

pemohonan 000009

pemohonan 000010

pemohonan 000011

pemohonan 000012

pemohonan 000013

pemohonan 000014

pemohonan 000015

pemohonan 000016

pemohonan 000017

pemohonan 000018

pemohonan 000019

pemohonan 000020

pemohonan 000021

pemohonan 000022

pemohonan 000023

pemohonan 000024

pemohonan 000025

pemohonan 000026

pemohonan 000027

pemohonan 000028

pemohonan 000029

pemohonan 000030

article 00000011

article 00000012

article 00000013

article 00000014

article 00000015

article 00000016

article 00000017

article 00000018

article 00000019

article 00000020

article 00000021

article 00000022

article 00000023

article 00000024

article 00000025

article 00000026

article 00000027

article 00000028

article 00000029

article 00000030

article 00000031

article 00000032

article 00000033

article 00000034

article 00000035

article 00000036

article 00000037

article 00000038

article 00000039

article 00000040

article 00000041

article 00000042

article 00000043

article 00000044

article 00000045

article 00000046

article 00000047

article 00000048

article 00000049

article 00000050

article 00000051

article 00000052

article 00000053

article 00000054

article 00000055

article 00000056

article 00000057

article 00000058

article 00000059

article 00000060

pusdataru 00010

pusdataru 00011

pusdataru 00012

pusdataru 00013

pusdataru 00014

pusdataru 00015

pusdataru 00016

pusdataru 00017

pusdataru 00018

pusdataru 00019

pusdataru 00020

pusdataru 00021

pusdataru 00022

pusdataru 00023

pusdataru 00024

pusdataru 00025

pusdataru 00026

pusdataru 00027

pusdataru 00028

pusdataru 00029

pusdataru 00030

pusdataru 00031

pusdataru 00032

pusdataru 00033

pusdataru 00034

pusdataru 00035

pusdataru 00036

pusdataru 00037

pusdataru 00038

pusdataru 00039

pusdataru 00040

pusdataru 00041

pusdataru 00042

pusdataru 00043

pusdataru 00044

pusdataru 00045

pusdataru 00046

pusdataru 00047

pusdataru 00048

pusdataru 00049

pusdataru 00050

pusdataru 00051

pusdataru 00052

pusdataru 00053

pusdataru 00054

pusdataru 00055

pusdataru 00056

pusdataru 00057

pusdataru 00058

pusdataru 00059

pusdataru 00060

article 2000001

article 2000002

article 2000003

article 2000004

article 2000005

article 2000006

article 2000007

article 2000008

article 2000009

article 2000010

article 2000011

article 2000012

article 2000013

article 2000014

article 2000015

article 2000016

article 2000017

article 2000018

article 2000019

article 2000020

article 2000021

article 2000022

article 2000023

article 2000024

article 2000025

article 2000026

article 2000027

article 2000028

article 2000029

article 2000030

article 2000031

article 2000032

article 2000033

article 2000034

article 2000035

article 2000036

article 2000037

article 2000038

article 2000039

article 2000040

article 2000041

article 2000042

article 2000043

article 2000044

article 2000045

article 2000046

article 2000047

article 2000048

article 2000049

article 2000050

article 2000051

article 2000052

article 2000053

article 2000054

article 2000055

article 2000056

article 2000057

article 2000058

article 2000059

article 2000060

invoice 00016

invoice 00017

invoice 00018

invoice 00019

invoice 00020

invoice 00021

invoice 00022

invoice 00023

invoice 00024

invoice 00025

invoice 00026

invoice 00027

invoice 00028

invoice 00029

invoice 00030

invoice 00031

invoice 00032

invoice 00033

invoice 00034

invoice 00035

invoice 00036

invoice 00037

invoice 00038

invoice 00039

invoice 00040

invoice 00041

invoice 00042

invoice 00043

invoice 00044

invoice 00045

news-1701
news-1701

yakinjp

yakinjp

rtp yakinjp

yakinjp

yakinjp

yakin jp

yakinjp id

maujp

maujp

maujp

\

sabung ayam online

sabung ayam online

SLOT MAHJONG

sabung ayam online

invoice 00001

invoice 00002

invoice 00003

invoice 00004

invoice 00005

invoice 00006

invoice 00007

invoice 00008

invoice 00009

invoice 00010

invoice 00011

invoice 00012

invoice 00013

invoice 00014

invoice 00015

invoice 00016

invoice 00017

invoice 00018

invoice 00019

invoice 00020

invoice 00021

invoice 00022

invoice 00023

invoice 00024

invoice 00025

invoice 00026

invoice 00027

invoice 00028

invoice 00029

invoice 00030

article 2000001

article 2000002

article 2000003

article 2000004

article 2000005

article 2000006

article 2000007

article 2000008

article 2000009

article 2000010

article 2000011

article 2000012

article 2000013

article 2000014

article 2000015

article 2000016

article 2000017

article 2000018

article 2000019

article 2000020

article 2000021

article 2000022

article 2000023

article 2000024

article 2000025

article 2000026

article 2000027

article 2000028

article 2000029

article 2000030

pusdataru 00001

pusdataru 00002

pusdataru 00003

pusdataru 00004

pusdataru 00005

pusdataru 00006

pusdataru 00007

pusdataru 00008

pusdataru 00009

pusdataru 00010

pusdataru 00011

pusdataru 00012

pusdataru 00013

pusdataru 00014

pusdataru 00015

pusdataru 00016

pusdataru 00017

pusdataru 00018

pusdataru 00019

pusdataru 00020

pusdataru 00021

pusdataru 00022

pusdataru 00023

pusdataru 00024

pusdataru 00025

pusdataru 00026

pusdataru 00027

pusdataru 00028

pusdataru 00029

pusdataru 00030

article 00000001

article 00000002

article 00000003

article 00000004

article 00000005

article 00000006

article 00000007

article 00000008

article 00000009

article 00000010

article 00000011

article 00000012

article 00000013

article 00000014

article 00000015

article 00000016

article 00000017

article 00000018

article 00000019

article 00000020

article 00000021

article 00000022

article 00000023

article 00000024

article 00000025

article 00000026

article 00000027

article 00000028

article 00000029

article 00000030

pemohonan 000001

pemohonan 000002

pemohonan 000003

pemohonan 000004

pemohonan 000005

pemohonan 000006

pemohonan 000007

pemohonan 000008

pemohonan 000009

pemohonan 000010

pemohonan 000011

pemohonan 000012

pemohonan 000013

pemohonan 000014

pemohonan 000015

pemohonan 000016

pemohonan 000017

pemohonan 000018

pemohonan 000019

pemohonan 000020

pemohonan 000021

pemohonan 000022

pemohonan 000023

pemohonan 000024

pemohonan 000025

pemohonan 000026

pemohonan 000027

pemohonan 000028

pemohonan 000029

pemohonan 000030

artikel 000000061

artikel 000000062

artikel 000000063

artikel 000000064

artikel 000000065

artikel 000000066

artikel 000000067

artikel 000000068

artikel 000000069

artikel 000000070

artikel 000000071

artikel 000000072

artikel 000000073

artikel 000000074

artikel 000000075

artikel 000000076

artikel 000000077

artikel 000000078

artikel 000000079

artikel 000000080

artikel 000000081

artikel 000000082

artikel 000000083

artikel 000000084

artikel 000000085

artikel 000000086

artikel 000000087

artikel 000000088

artikel 000000089

artikel 000000090

pengadilan 000031

pengadilan 000032

pengadilan 000033

pengadilan 000034

pengadilan 000035

pengadilan 000036

pengadilan 000037

pengadilan 000038

pengadilan 000039

pengadilan 000040

pengadilan 000041

pengadilan 000042

pengadilan 000043

pengadilan 000044

pengadilan 000045

pengadilan 000046

pengadilan 000047

pengadilan 000048

pengadilan 000049

pengadilan 000050

pengadilan 000051

pengadilan 000052

pengadilan 000053

pengadilan 000054

pengadilan 000055

pengadilan 000056

pengadilan 000057

pengadilan 000058

pengadilan 000059

pengadilan 000060

pengadilan 000061

pengadilan 000062

pengadilan 000063

pengadilan 000064

pengadilan 000065

pengadilan 000066

pengadilan 000067

pengadilan 000068

pengadilan 000069

pengadilan 000070

pengadilan 000071

pengadilan 000072

pengadilan 000073

pengadilan 000074

pengadilan 000075

pengadilan 000076

pengadilan 000077

pengadilan 000078

pengadilan 000079

pengadilan 000080

sport 00011

sport 00012

sport 00013

sport 00014

sport 00015

sport 00016

sport 00017

sport 00018

sport 00019

sport 00020

sport 00021

sport 00022

sport 00023

sport 00024

sport 00025

sport 00026

sport 00027

sport 00028

sport 00029

sport 00030

sport 00031

sport 00032

sport 00033

sport 00034

sport 00035

perkara 0000031

perkara 0000032

perkara 0000033

perkara 0000034

perkara 0000035

perkara 0000036

perkara 0000037

perkara 0000038

perkara 0000039

perkara 0000040

perkara 0000041

perkara 0000042

perkara 0000043

perkara 0000044

perkara 0000045

perkara 0000046

perkara 0000047

perkara 0000048

perkara 0000049

perkara 0000050

perkara 0000051

perkara 0000052

perkara 0000053

perkara 0000054

perkara 0000055

perkara 0000056

perkara 0000057

perkara 0000058

perkara 0000059

perkara 0000060

perkara 0000061

perkara 0000062

perkara 0000063

perkara 0000064

perkara 0000065

perkara 0000066

perkara 0000067

perkara 0000068

perkara 0000069

perkara 0000070

perkara 0000071

perkara 0000072

perkara 0000073

perkara 0000074

perkara 0000075

perkara 0000076

perkara 0000077

perkara 0000078

perkara 0000079

perkara 0000080

news-1701